Legal Risks When a U.S. Citizen or U.S. Company Transfers Assets to a Korean Individual or Korean Company
Jungsup Kim, U.S. Attorney
Frederick Lee & Kim LLC
T. +82-2-6013-2256, 2257
office@flkim.com / jsk@flkim.com
Recently, while reviewing a real case, a significant legal issue came to light. In that matter, a property located in the State of Hawaii was transferred into the name of a Korean corporation, and questions were raised regarding whether proper legal procedures had been followed during the transfer process.
The issue in this case was not merely a simple change of title. Rather, it involved the legal, tax, and potential criminal risks that arise when U.S. assets are transferred to a foreign entity. According to statements and documentary evidence from individuals involved, the Hawaii property owned by a U.S. company appears to have been transferred into the name of a Korean corporation without proper notice or approval procedures. Additionally, questions were raised as to whether the required tax filings and legal documentation were properly completed.
This situation illustrates how complex and highly regulated the transfer of U.S. assets can be when a U.S. citizen or U.S. company transfers assets to a Korean individual or a Korean company.
Many people assume that transferring U.S. real estate or business assets to a Korean company is simply a matter of “changing the name on the title.” In reality, however, multiple legal frameworks must be reviewed and addressed simultaneously.
These typically include:
If assets are transferred without properly addressing these legal requirements, the consequences may extend beyond civil liability and could potentially lead to criminal liability as well.
When transferring U.S. real estate to a foreign individual or foreign corporation, several legal procedures must be properly completed.
In the United States, a Deed is required to transfer ownership of real property.
Common types of deeds include:
(A detailed discussion of each type of deed will be addressed in a separate column.)
In addition, the following procedures are generally required:
If ownership is transferred without following these procedures, the validity of the transfer itself may be challenged.
In practice, when transferring U.S. real estate to a foreign party, most individuals complete the deed preparation and recording without difficulty. However, the more important issues often arise in the regulatory and tax compliance steps that follow.
In Hawaii—and similarly in many U.S. states—a Conveyance Tax filing is required when real property is transferred.
Typical filing documents include:
Failure to file these documents may not only result in tax issues but could also raise suspicions of improper or unlawful transfer. In certain circumstances, it could trigger an audit or even criminal investigation.
When U.S. real estate is transferred to a foreign individual or foreign entity, the transaction must comply with the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act (FIRPTA).
Under FIRPTA:
Failure to comply with FIRPTA can result in significant tax liabilities and penalties.
One of the most serious legal concerns in asset transfer cases is Fraudulent Transfer.
Examples of potentially fraudulent transfers include:
Fraudulent transfer laws exist both at the federal level and at the state level. In Hawaii, the relevant law is the:
Hawaii Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act
(HRS §651C-4)
If a court determines that a transfer was fraudulent, the following consequences may occur:
Another common issue in cross-border disputes involves using a Korean corporation to hold U.S. assets.
While such structures may appear legitimate, U.S. tax law imposes strict reporting obligations.
Key reporting requirements include:
Form 5471
Required when a U.S. person owns or controls 10% or more of a foreign corporation.
Form 5472
Required for reportable transactions between a foreign-owned entity and a U.S. entity.
FBAR / FATCA Reporting
Required for certain foreign financial accounts.
Failure to comply with these reporting obligations can lead to allegations of tax evasion or false reporting.
When assets belonging to a U.S. company are transferred to a foreign entity, corporate law principles such as fiduciary duty become critically important.
Certain activities may create significant legal exposure, including:
Such conduct may lead to civil claims such as:
When combined with tax violations, these issues may escalate into criminal investigations.
In the United States, tax-related matters are treated with particular seriousness. As a result, asset transfer issues do not always remain civil disputes.
They may lead to criminal allegations such as:
These offenses carry severe penalties.
For example:
For this reason, cross-border asset transfers should always be reviewed by qualified legal and tax professionals.
When a U.S. citizen or U.S. company transfers assets to a Korean individual or Korean corporation, several key principles must be followed.
Real estate law, tax law, corporate law, and international tax regulations must all be considered together.
This includes compliance with:
This includes maintaining:
Examples include:
Transferring U.S. assets to a Korean individual or Korean corporation is not a simple change of ownership.
The process involves complex legal issues, including:
If these legal requirements are not properly addressed, the consequences may include invalidated property transfers, tax assessments, civil lawsuits, and even criminal liability.
Therefore, when dealing with cross-border asset transfers, one fundamental principle must always be remembered:
“Design the legal structure before transferring the assets.”
Following this principle is the safest and most effective way to manage international asset transfers.